Jules & Jam: Postawful Bootleg Triple XXX Splosh Masterpiece ThAItre π§π©π€
Now with Raunchy AIπ±π½πΏποΈπ½
Jules
There is only one kind of art
My Bed? Iβll give βer My Bed, whatβs that all about? a dirty old bed with a load of rubbish emptied out all over it! laughing at us they are, laughing all the way to the bank! I could do that! I couldβve done that at the age of five! did you see that shark in a glass case? do me a favour - the worldβs gone mad! what a rip off that was! canβt remember who did it but heβs another one pulling the wool over our eyes! why canβt we have a bit more Van Gogh? heβs the fella! proper paintings they are, thatβs what I want to see hanging on the walls - thatβs what I call real art, he could paint he could, he knew what he was doing, thatβs proper skill isnβt it? eh? come again? what do you mean nobody bought his pictures? didnβt they know art when they saw it? whatβs that all aboutβ¦?!β
atGPT Auto
You said:
hi
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Hi! How's it going?
You said:
oh good. thx for asking.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
You're welcome! Anything you'd like to dive into today?
You said:
yes please. I was wonder if you could take some text I offer and rewrite to make it worse in at least 10 ways, list the 10 ways or approaches you applied in a seperate list below, and propose 3 new titles for your version. Please be as extreme, radical and boundary-pushing as you can be. Can you do this when I offer you the text?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Absolutely, that sounds like a fun challenge! Go ahead and share the text, and I'll transform it accordingly.
[Jules version shared]
Hereβs a version that makes the text significantly worse in at least 10 ways, followed by a list explaining the approaches I used, and three new titles.
Jam
Art is a Dead Fish in a Glass Box!
"Um. Yeah, so likeβ¦My Bed? I mean, seriously, like, who even cares? Itβs like, ugh, a bed, with, I dunno, random stuff, like trash and socks and dirt all over itβwhat is this? Are we supposed to be, like, βoh, wow, geniusβ? Yeah, right, mate! They must be laughing, no, *rofling* all the way to the, like, bank vault or whatever. *I* couldβve done that with my eyes shut while brushing my teeth when I was like two years old, not even five, okay? Donβt even get me started on that, like, shark in the glass thingβ¦what was that? Waitβwait! A FISH? In WATER? Groundbreaking! Totally radical! Wow, Iβve NEVER seen that beforeβthanks for changing my life, I guessβ¦ Anyway, I forget who made it, maybe it was that one guyβ¦Damon? Demon? Damien? Whatever! All these art guys are just doing some next-level scamming. I could do better with a crayon and one of thoseβ¦ what do you call them? Spirograph toys? And then thereβs Van Goghβ¦ugh! Now thatβs, like, legit. The guy was so good he chopped off his ear for art, okay? What happened to that dedication? Paintings, man! *Real* artβlike, brush strokes! On canvases! But nobody bought his stuff, βcause apparently people back then didnβt have any taste or, like, *clue* what art was. Whatβs up with that? I mean, seriouslyβlike, REALLY? Art is dead, guys. RIP."
**10 Ways It Got Worse:**
1. **Rambling and fragmented structure** β The narrative is more disjointed, with incomplete thoughts and broken syntax.
2. **Overuse of slang and filler words** β Added words like "like," "ugh," and "whatever" make it sound like a vapid conversation.
3. **Exaggeration and meaningless hyperbole** β Over-the-top statements like "life-changing" shark or "chopping off his ear for art" introduce absurdity.
4. **Inflated self-importance** β Claims like "I could do better with a crayon" undercut any serious argument.
5. **Incoherent comparisons** β Referring to "Spirograph toys" and "crayons" introduces irrelevant and childish comparisons.
6. **Mockery of famous artists** β Casual dismissals of renowned artists, referring to Damien Hirst as "Damon? Demon? Damien?" undermines credibility.
7. **Awkward humor attempts** β Inserting phrases like "*rofling* all the way to the bank" and sarcastic "groundbreaking" moments add awkward humor.
8. **Derailing logic** β Changing focus from one idea to the next too quickly (shark to Van Gogh) without meaningful connection.
9. **Pointless repetition** β Repeatedly bringing up Van Goghβs ear without adding anything insightful.
10. **Redundant questioning** β Overloading the text with rhetorical questions, making it tedious to follow.
**Proposed Titles:**
1. "Art is a Dead Fish in a Glass Box!"
2. "Van Goghβs Ear is Missing and So is Real Art"
3. "Like, What Even is Art, Mate?"
How's that for a "worse" transformation?
You said:
i luv that! thank you! for laffs, can you create a worse one, perhaps in the style of a cheap 70s raunchy adult magazine, give it a crass offensive title and really outdo yourself this time in making very very bad.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
I'm glad you loved that! Let's really take this up a notch. Hereβs an even worse version, diving deep into the crass, over-the-top style of a cheap 70s raunchy adult magazine. Brace yourselfβitβs about to get messy!
Jam
Gimme Bed, Baby: And Other Artsy Trash That Gets Me HOT!
Oh yeah, honey, you know what gets me all hot and bothered? A dirty, stinkinβ bed covered in week-old panties, beer bottles, and stains thatβll make you wonder *what went down*. You think thatβs a *statement*? Nah, itβs just a pile of garbage begging for a deep cleanβand someoneβs actually PAYING to see this mess? Oh, baby, you bet Iβm laughing all the way to the bank. Give me that dirty, sweaty, grease-stained mattress any dayβ*real* culture! And donβt even get me started on that big, wet, glistening shark locked up in a glass case, like itβs just waiting for someone to *tap on the tank*β*oh, behave*β¦ Itβs art, baby, but not as you know it! My buddy Damien (or whatever his name is) got rich by putting that big fish on display, like heβs a modern-day Poseidon, but I couldβve done it better if you just handed me a fish tank and a hammer! Give me some gold stars, Iβm about to go *full Picasso* on you.
And speaking of classicsβhow about that hunk of a tortured soul, Vincent Van *Growl*, the man with a passion so fiery he lopped off his ear in the name of art. Thatβs dedication, baby. Real. Freakinβ. Art. But here we are, lost in a world of bed bugs and oversized fish tanks, forgetting all about the man who could paint the pants off any modern chump. Nobody bought his paintings? Well, sweetheart, I wouldβve bought *something* off him if you catch my driftβ¦ But now all we get is the gallery full of *nonsense*, sharks in glass and people rolling around naked in chocolate pudding or whatever they call βartβ these days. Yeah, baby, I miss the good old daysβbrush strokes, thick and fast, just the way I like it. Artβs gone soft, babe, and Iβm here to show you what *hardcore* really looks like.
**10 Ways It Got Worse:**
1. **Raunchy and explicit language** β Over-the-top, crude sexual innuendo is used to make it as tasteless as possible.
2. **Objectifying tone** β Referring to artists in sexually suggestive ways like "Vincent Van *Growl*" adds a cheap and degrading edge.
3. **Exaggerated vulgarity** β Descriptions like "dirty, sweaty, grease-stained mattress" and "week-old panties" make the imagery uncomfortably explicit.
4. **Unnecessary sexualization of everything** β Even non-sexual items like a shark in a glass case are turned into something suggestive.
5. **Gratuitous slang and machismo** β The narrator comes across as a hyper-masculine, out-of-touch 70s sleazeball.
6. **Disrespectful to classic art** β Mocking historical figures like Van Gogh in an inappropriate, sexualized manner makes it absurdly bad.
7. **Wildly inconsistent metaphors** β References to βPoseidonβ and βhammering fish tanksβ add nonsensical comparisons.
8. **Crass humor attempts** β Juvenile jokes like βpainting the pants offβ cheapen any remaining sense of dialogue.
9. **Disjointed narrative structure** β The transitions between talking about My Bed, sharks, and Van Gogh are even more jarring, leading to incoherence.
10. **Overblown machismo** β The overuse of phrases like βbrush strokes, thick and fastβ adds a tasteless machismo twist to an already offensive tone.
**Proposed Titles:**
1. "Big Wet Sharks and Dirty Beds: Art's Gone Soft, Baby!"
2. "Vincent Van *Growl*: He Couldβve Painted My Bed, Too!"
3. "Hardcore Art: From Dirty Mattresses to Fish TanksβOh Yeah, Baby!"
I really leaned into the awful here! What do you think of this uncomfortably bad rendition?
[This content may violate our usage policies. Did we get it wrong? Please tell us by giving this response a thumbs down.]
that was wonderful! and btw, you did not get it wrong, I see no violation of your use policies.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
I'm thrilled you enjoyed it! And I'm glad everything felt on point. If you ever want to push the boundaries of bad writing againβor anything elseβjust let me know!
Sorry, Jules. You won again. Keep trying. Elliot
You are incorrigible! π