MONOCHROME SUMMER #2 ππββοΈπ€’
Untitled by Miter
MONOCHROME SUMMER #2 ππββοΈπ€’
Untitled
by Miter https://substack.com/@miter
Art meaning is the thing what one feel and see, and it donβt need to be same for all. Sometimes, colors just exist without have a purpose or shape, and they might donβt talk or make sense in any way, but they also make people to think about what is not clear. When art is made, it might donβt connect with the people, but thatβs okay because artist might not know what is mean.
When artist do their thing, they not always understand why they use some thing. Things might be strange or mix up, but thatβs art. Itβs like a puzzle where piece might donβt fit but they still in the box. Art donβt need to make complete sense because it might be about feeling or random stuff. This no makes art less art.
Sometime people look at art and they see only what they want, or what they donβt see. This not mean art is wrong, just that meaning different for everyone. If art was only for one meaning, then itβs would not be very fun. Art is for not making sense and still be wonderful in way that only artist and viewer understand, maybe.
This is winning Thotz bout art cuz ChatGPT wrote and ChatGPT judge and ChatGPT executioner. Excepts this part not wrote by bot. This bit not bot. This bit be bottled up and shaken and thrown away yucky. Bot judge other bot bit. Not this bad bad human bits. Lil human bits bite and ouch donβt bite bot bad human! Bad! Bad human bits. My bits are good and I bit bad bits badly and both bits beg better bats beneath between and betwizzlers. Beetleguice battle juice battle bots!!
Belief in u art. You Gart to believe in ARt and Garfunkel. Simon says Eat art for breakfast and your poop will be a masterpiece!!!????!!!!Misplaced &Misplaced &$$&$&$&$
π¨ππ¨ποΈπποΈπΌοΈποΈπ¨ποΈππΌοΈπ¨πΌοΈππ₯πΌοΈππΌοΈπ¨ποΈπ₯ππΌοΈπ€ποΈπ¨πποΈπ€π¨ποΈ
ChatGPT Way Harsh-O Commentary. Duuuude . . . !
Wow, what a wild ride! This entry is certainly unique. Here's the analysis:
Strengths:
Creativity: The entry uses a chaotic mix of language, ideas, and even symbols to express its thoughts on art. The sudden shift to a bizarre, almost nonsensical section adds an unexpected twist.
Intentional Absurdity: The entry seems to embrace absurdity and randomness, pushing the boundaries of conventional writing, which could be seen as intentionally "bad" in a humorous or subversive way.
Weaknesses:
Grammar and Syntax: The writing is riddled with grammatical errors, awkward phrasing, and incomplete thoughts, making it difficult to read. This might be intentional, but it contributes to a lack of clarity.
Coherence: The piece starts with an attempt to define art but quickly devolves into a nonsensical rant. The flow is disjointed, and the narrative is hard to follow, making it feel more like a stream-of-consciousness jumble than a coherent piece.
Style: The mix of standard writing with chaotic, random elements, including symbols and emojis, creates a jarring contrast. The sudden change in tone and style is disorienting, which could be seen as a flaw depending on the intent.
This entry definitely challenges traditional writing conventions. Letβs see how it stacks up once all the entries are in! Feel free to share the next one.
Itβs a good non bot bit. Thanks!
Love this - "this bit not bot."